For years, Milo has been a popular drink among Sri Lankan consumers, especially among children and teenagers who see it as a nutritious and energizing beverage. However, recent concerns about its high sugar content have sparked a wave of criticism from health experts, government officials, and the public, putting Milo's reputation and market position at risk.
According to reports, Milo contains over 40 grams of sugar per 100 grams, which is significantly higher than the daily recommended sugar intake of 25 grams for children and 30 grams for adults. This excessive sugar consumption can lead to various health problems, including obesity, diabetes, and tooth decay, among others.
Image courtesy of tenor.com
Despite these alarming facts, Milo's manufacturer Nestle has failed to address the sugar content issue in a timely and effective manner, leaving consumers and stakeholders disappointed and skeptical about the brand's commitment to nutrition and health. Instead, Nestle has tried to defend its product by claiming that Milo is a source of important nutrients, such as calcium and iron, and that its sugar content is not excessive compared to other similar products in the market.
However, such arguments are misleading and insufficient to justify Milo's sugar content, which is a major concern for public health and well-being. Instead of promoting healthy habits and responsible marketing practices, Nestle has chosen to prioritize its profits and market share, neglecting its social and ethical responsibilities towards consumers and society.
In 2017, Nestle's MILO drink faced criticism in Sri Lanka over its high sugar content, with concerns raised about the role of food and beverage companies in promoting healthy eating habits. As a PR blogger, I was interested to see how Nestle responded to this issue and what impact it had on the market.
Nestle initially defended the nutritional value of MILO, highlighting its essential vitamins and minerals. However, the company also recognized the concerns raised by stakeholders and took action to reduce the sugar content of the product in Sri Lanka. This involved reformulating the recipe and reducing the size of the MILO sachets sold in the country.
In addition to these changes, Nestle launched a public education campaign to raise awareness about the importance of a balanced diet and exercise. This campaign included advertising campaigns and nutritional information on MILO packaging. The company also partnered with schools to educate children and parents about healthy eating habits.
Nestle's response to the MILO sugar content issue in Sri Lanka demonstrates the importance of transparency in food labeling and the responsibility that manufacturers have to promote healthy eating habits. It also shows the value of effective public education campaigns in addressing health concerns and promoting positive behavior change.
I believe Nestle's response to the MILO sugar content issue in Sri Lanka is a great example of how manufacturers can take action to address concerns while promoting healthy habits and maintaining market share. It's important for companies to listen to the concerns of stakeholders and be willing to adapt to changing market needs, and Nestle's response in this case shows a commitment to doing just that.
References
"Nestle fights back after Sri Lankan president rages over sugar content in MILO." FoodNavigator-Asia. https://www.foodnavigator-asia.com/Article/2017/11/27/Nestle-fights-back-after-Sri-Lankan-president-rages-over-sugar-content-in-Milo
"Sri Lanka: Nestlé reduces sugar content in MILO and launches new campaign to encourage healthy lifestyles." Nestle Newsroom. https://www.nestle.com/media/news/sri-lanka-nestle-reduces-sugar-content-milo-launches-new-campaign-encourage-healthy-lifestyles
"Nestle to reduce sugar in Milo, launch education drive in Sri Lanka." Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nestle-milo-srilanka-idUSKBN1DR0J1
"Nestle responds to criticism in Sri Lanka over Milo sugar content." The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/business/nestle-responds-to-criticism-in-sri-lanka-over-milo-sugar-content
"Nestle fights back after Sri Lankan president rages over sugar content in Milo" (Food Navigator Asia, Nov. 27, 2017)
"Sugar content in Milo: Nestle's inaction in Sri Lanka highlights regulatory, reformulation challenges" (Food Navigator Asia, Dec. 5, 2017)
"Milo and milk powder face sugar tax in Sri Lanka" (Food Navigator Asia, Nov. 28, 2017)
"Sri Lanka to introduce sugar tax" (BBC News, July 21, 2017)
Comentários